Bespoke workshop to support University policy on AI use in summative assessment
In-person session in 2025-26 to support your academic team
When: At a time that suits your team
Facilitator: Centre for Teaching and Learning
About the workshop
To support your course team in implementing the University’s policy on AI use in summative assessment policy, we are offering a bespoke 90-minute workshop during 2025–26.
The workshop had a very useful focus on selected authorised use of AI. Students will need to be given very clear guidance about what they can and cannot do with AI - the suggestions provided were very helpful.
Participant, Impact of AI on summative assessment workshop
Impact of AI on summative assessment workshop
Are you looking for support in reviewing your summative assessment to align with Oxford’s new policy on the permitted use of AI use in summative assessment?
Review their summative assessment design and criteria, task by task, to ensure alignment with the permitted use of AI
Declare whether and how students can use AI in summative assessment, for example, by a category system for different assignments on courses
Specify the forms of declaration expected of students when they make use of AI, where permitted.
This workshop will enable you to
Review your summative assessments using the AI assessment triage tool to evaluate current tasks and criteria
Explore practical options, including course-level strategies that support academic integrity and appropriate use of AI
Explore options categories and decide which levels of AI use are appropriate for your assessments
Access further guidance, including signposting to relevant resources and examples from across the University.
How to register for the workshop
Register your interest for the workshop by completing our short course and assessment (re)design 90-minute workshop form (choose option 3 on the list). We will then contact you for a brief discussion about your requirements, and set a date for the workshop.
Please note: This workshop is intended for course teams only to ensure that a core group of academics can contribute directly to the conversations and decisions required.
